aipeu puri

aipeu puri

Saturday, 5 July 2014

FINACLE CBS push us in DEBACLE ; NFPE writes to DIRECTORATE for RESCUE

NATIONAL FEDERATION OF POSTAL EMPLOYEES
1st Floor, North Avenue Post office Building, New Delhi - 110001
 


Ref: PF/NFPE/CBS                                                                                      Dated – 27.06.2014
To
Ms Kaveri Banerjee
Secretary
Department of Posts
Dak Bhawan, New Delhi – 110001
Madam,
Sub: -  Incalculable miseries and untold suffering to the operative staff in CBS rolled out offices – Immediate remedial and rescue operations sought for – reg.
At the outset, we appreciate the efforts leads to technological advancements and extend our fullest cooperation in the journey to reach the desired goals of implementing innovative customer centric services and operational efficiency enhancement by inducting state of art technology.
But to our dismay, the CBS migrated offices are now facing incalculable miseries and untold sufferings due to lack of adequate network capabilities and software support of the vendors. The following are the issues to be set right in war foot manner at the initial stage itself otherwise leads to garboil and distress among the stake holders especially among the working staff.
1)      Insufficient bandwidth Network:
            Providing of strong and stable network is base of successful implementation of India Post project.   Now almost all HOs have been given 2 MBPS bandwidth line, LSG SOs 512 KBPS line and B and C class offices have been given 256 KBPS line. If ‘India Post Project-2012’ is fully implemented, all the work of Post Offices will depend on these network. Present bandwidth speed is very less and due to low bandwidth, Finacle page is either not opening and  some time opening very slowly.   Due to this PO staff are forced to work up to night 10 pm many days. In many occasions in every CBS migrated office, the ‘Login’ is inconsistent and for each transaction “Login” is forced.
If CSI and PLI are migrated and placed on this network the situation may further worsen. Hence we request to provide at least 4 MB bandwidth line to HOs, 2 MB bandwidth line to LSG SOs and 1 MB bandwidth line to B and C class offices.
2) Failure of Sify:
            In India Post Project 2012, NI Vender is Sify. On observation of quality and quantity of service being provided by them it is very much proved that  M/S Sify is incapable to give service to this  big department.  They do not have sufficient skilled manpower and it seems that they are not intending to give good quality service also.   At initial stage itself they have not made proper survey of all offices.  Before installing and commissioning they were very keen on taking installation report from concerned Postmasters/Sub Postmasters. 
            It is told that, as per MOU, all offices should be provided with NSP-1 and NSP-2 lines.  In almost all offices, NSP-1 is BSNL line and NSP-2 is either Sify line or Airtel datacard.   It is observed that in many offices they have installed Airtel datacard ,where as  Airtel signal is  not available at that place.
            It is also observed that M/S Sify is not recharging Airtel datacard  installed.  Instead they are recharging on receipt of complaint from concerned offices.  By doing this they are deviating from MOU and leaving the staff in the field in distress.
3) Finacle Problem:
            If we come to Finacle part, it is another tragedy.   Initially it was boosted that Finacle is fully foolproof software and successfully implemented in many banks.  We could not understand why Infosys is not utilizing experience gained in banks and  implementing  here.  There are so many bugs in the software and  more surprisingly  even after lapse of 6 months of implementation, nothing is changed.   All the issues raised at the time of January-2014 is still not resolved.  Moreover Finacle server becomes inaccessible many time in peak business hours or responds very slow. It is a naked truth that we are losing clientle and distancing from the customers only due to faulty service of vendors.
4) Lack of Guidance:
            No separate rulings are received to suit Finacle Environment. No authorities are giving authoritative guidance on many issues. 
For example
§  Role of SOSB in HO after implementation of Finacle at SOs,
§  Role of SBCO at HO
§  Fate of manual records on transfer accounts from one Finacle office to other etc.
5) Supply of Printers and Computers:
            At initial stage  new Computers and printers are supplied to pilot offices.  Rest of the offices are having   more than 5 year old  Computers and Printers  which are not suitable to present scenario.  Administration is pressing  hard to migrate offices without supplying required hardware. The old computers and peripherals either to be revamped or replaced to make it compatiable to the present environment.
6) Problem of User credentials:
            One each User credential is given to  trained staff.  But it is not clearly told what action to be taken while SPM/PA goes on leave especially in B class offices.   As sharing of  user credential is very  risky and dangerous, alternative arrangement  should be made immediately.
7) Due to slow network and frequent failure of server customers of the department are frustrated and moving out the department and needed immediate attention.
8. You may aware that we are struggling with outdated Computers and peripherals, which were purchased during the year 2000 to 2005 and immediate supply of needy new hardware to ensure the technological transformation in and effective manner.
9. Even proper up gradation of CPU is not made in many areas and the Software loaded is upto Windows XP in most of the offices. Presently it is a fact that windows XP is not supported by the Microsoft with updates.
10. Finacle can be better loaded with Windows 7 and hence the officers at ground level are pressurized to use pirated version of Windows 7, which may lead to litigation with Microsoft apart from non supporting with updates.
11. The MOU made with M/s Sify, for net work integration is limiting to low bandwidth such as 256 Kbps to 512 Kbps in many areas, serving with 1 server and 4 to 5 nodes, resulting in sluggish connectivity and takes hours together to transform the data. This results in hang over and the transactions could not be able to be made at the instant, as the Department expects, It requires atleast 2 to 4 Mbps and M/s Sify refused to increase the bandwidth now.
12. Further in the Data Centre, it requires to the level of 400 Mbps on the Network to receive the Data transmitted at a time from all the 680 offices but Sify is learnt to be provided with a minimum of 200 Mbps capacity. This affects the receipt of data from the end users at a time and take hours to complete the process. Further expansion is required when there is further migration.
13. The area of occupation in the main server at Mumbai maintained by M/S Reliance Ltd. is also not sufficient, which results in sluggish transmission of data from the entire 680 offices at present, at a time and even the validation cannot be made before 8:00 PM or 10:00 PM on all the days.
14. End of day process cannot be made even on daily basis and the staff have to wait for the nod from the Infosys even after midnights on several days and at times it can be made on the next day morning. Even the women employees are compelled to complete the EOD process in midnights and their husbands or wards waiting till midnights to take them to home.
15. Even the Help desk provided is not answering and the end users are taken to task and receiving brick bats from the irate public.
16. This results in closing of accounts in large numbers that too, can be made not on the date of presentation but after few days and our Department looses large chunk of customers, because of the miscalculations, wrong estimations and over ambitious activities and inadequate technological support.
17. Even the first and prestigious ATM of our Department unveiled by the ex Finance Minister Sri. P. Chidambaram at T. Nagar HO is not functioning from the date of installation and only 10 ATM cards are supplied on the first instant, that too only to the staff and some friendly users of T. Nagar HPO. But the ATM is provided with 24x7 A/C and a paid Guard, making huge loss to the Department and receiving severe criticism from the Print media.
18. The women employees should be relieved from this area of operation, till the situation improves, in order to avoid late night stays at offices inviting gender problems and unsafe returns to their home at midnights.
19. Further, adequate hardware and infrastructure should be given immediately to the CBS migrated offices with sufficient man power and proper remuneration for the extended hours, the staffs re serving.
20. In spite of all above cited problems the Postal staff is being worked on finacle software as matter of challenge and trying to give best services to the customers. In spite of all efforts the customers are not satisfying/delighting which hampers the reputation of the department. No PO which is upgraded with finacle are being closed before 8 PM every day. We are ready to work hard provided, solution for above problems are to be solved.
It is requested to sort out all the issues arising out of the CBS Migration and all the vendors need to be instructed to provide all the technological support as required by the field staff. As this is the pilot and sorting stage, if we failed to pull up the vendors to the level of expectation and necessity, later full implementation, restoration may be difficult with this vendor support.
It is further requested to spare some time and provide opportunity to present and brief our case in person for the welfare of our department staff and the clientle. Your immediate intervention as if house on fire is requested.
A line in reply is highly appreciated.
With profound regards,
Yours faithfully,

(M. Krishnan)

Secretary General

CORRIGENDUM TO NFPE/FNPO MEMORANDUM SUBMITTED TO 7th PAY COMMISSION.

     1.  (a)    Chapter - IV, Page 17 - Para 4.1 - Categories - SL 7,8 & 9 may be corrected 
          as follows:


        7.     Postmen/Mailguard (MACP-I) - 5200-20200 - GP 2400 - 56000
        8.     Postmen/Mail Guard (MACP-II) - 5200-20200 - GP 2800 - 66000
        9.     Postmen/Mail Guard (MACP-III) - 9300-34800 - GP 4200 – 74000

1.(b) Chapter - IV, Page 17 - Para 4.1 - Categories - SL 10,11 & 12 may be corrected as follows:
        10. Supervisor(LSG)/ MACP-I PA / SA-  5200-20200 - GP 2800 - 66000
        11.Senior Supervisor (HSG-II) / MACP-II PA / SA- 9300-34800 - GP 4200 - 74000
        12.Chief Supervisor (HSG-I) / MACP-III PA / SA- 9300-34800 - GP 4600 - 78000

2.     Chapter XIX - Page 138 - Para 19.2.1 Sentence-3 may be corrected as follows:

        “They are having the parity with Postmen and considering their arduous nature of duties and responsibilities, they shall be placed in the existing Grade Pay of Rs.2,800/- (and not 2,400)  which is equivalent to the proposed minimum pay of Rs.46,000/- (and not 41000) as demanded by the Staff Side in the entry scale.

3.     Chapter XVIII - Page 120 & 121 - Para 18.3.1 and 18.4.1 Column - Grade Pay of Cleaner and Semi-skilled may be corrected as 1800/- instead of 1300 & 1650.

MEMBERS & LEADERS YOUR ATTENTION PLEASE



          Please read the memorandum carefully and suggest immediately any corrections/additions required in it.  We will incorporate all acceptable suggestions/corrections/additions in our supplimentary memorandum to be submitted to 7th CPC before 20-07-2014.
REVISION OF PRE-2006 PENSION WITH EFFECT FROM 01.01.2006 AS PER CAT ORDER DATED 01.11.2011 FOR ALL PRE-2006 PENSIONERS AND NOT LIMITED ONLY TO PETITIONERS
Bharat Pensioners Samaj has pointed out Government’s mis-interpretation of Hon’ble Princpal CAT’s Order for revising Pre-2006 Pension with effect from 01-01-2006, to the effect that the order would be applicable only to the petitioners who have filed the case before CAT and not to all Pre-2006 Pensioners. However, the contention of Bharat Pensioners Samaj in this regard is that Hon’ble CAT’s Order was confirmed by Hon’ble High Court and reached finality after Hon’ble Supreme Court dismissed Government’s SLP, Review Petition and as well as Curative Petition. Hence the same is not an order In personam
No.SG/PBS/Legal/014/1
Dated 02.07.2014
Shri Sanjay Kothari
IAS
Secretary,
M/O Personnel PG AR & Pensions
Dear Sir,
Sub:     Implementation of the order dated 1.11.2011 of Hon’ble CAT, Principal Bench, New Delhi in OA No. 655/2010.
1 Kindly connect DOP &PW letter No. 38/7 7-A/09-P8.PW (A) dated 29th May 2014 addressed to the Secretary (Shri Sant Bhushan Lal) Central Government SAG (S-29) on the above subject.
2. At the outset, we will like to point out that the above letter is in the nature of continuation of willful defiance of the CAT’s order by DOP &PW and is intended to GO AGAINST THE  judicial directives. What is displayed in this letter under reference is a deliberate mis-interpretation and distortion of the Hon’ble CAT’s order dated 15. 5.2014. Para 2 of the above letter states that ‘As directed by the Hon’ble CAT, the order dated 01.11.2011 of Hon’ble CAT, Principal Bench, New Delhi is required to be implemented in respect of petitioners in OA No. 655/2010″ which is factually incorrect and misleading. Hon’ble CAT-PB vide its order dated 01.11.2011 quashed clarificatory OM dated 03.10.2008 and directed to refix the pension of all pre-2006 retirees w.e.f. 1.1.2006, based on the Resolution dated 29.08.2008. While dismissing WP (C) No 153512012 of UOI on 29-4-2013, Hon’ble Delhi High Court upheld the verdict of the CAT PB. Dismissing SLP (C) No.23055/2013 filed by UOI against the judgement of Hon’ble Delhi High Court on 29-7-2013 and then Review Petition (C) No 2492/2013 on 12-11-2013 and finally Curative Petition (C) No 12612014 on 30.4.2011, Hon’ble Supreme Court upheld the Judgement of the Hon’ble Delhi High Court with this, CAT verdict dated 1-11-2011. referred to 1 has attained legal finality.
3. On 15.05.2014, the Hon’ble CAT-PB disposed of Contempt Petition No 158/2012 directing the UoI to implement the directions of the Tribunal Honble Delhi High Court upholding the verdict of CAT PB, took note of DOP letter F.No. 38137/08-P&PW (A) dated 28th January, 2013 whereby the pension of all pre-2006 pensioners was stepped up from an arbitrary date of 24-9-2012 as per the Resolution dated 29-8-2008. Further in Para 2 & 3 of the Judgement it is noted that the Government of India has tacitly admitted that it was in the wrong and that the Tribunal is correct and the only issue that survives are the denying arrears to be paid to the pensioners with effect from January 01, 2006
4. The operative part of the Honble CAT’s order dated 15-5-2014 is contained in Para 3 and reads as “It would be appropriate to dispose of the matter with direction to the respon-dents to implement the directions of the Tribunal expeditiously, preferably within three months.” (Emphasis added). The direction of the Tribunal is with reference to its order dated 1-11-2011. The Hon’ble CAT never diluted its order dated 1.11.2011 nor could it have done so in its contempt jurisdiction especially when its order dated 1.11.2011 had got merged with the judgment dated 29.4.2013 of the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in WP (C) No. 1535/2012.
4.1 Consequently, contention of implementing this directive only in respect of the members of the SAG S-29 Association up to the date of filing of OA No. 06550010 is not valid. All retired Central Government employees covered under the category of pre-2006 pensionersare entitled for re-fixation of pension from 1-1-2006 as per the directive of the CAT-PB dated 1-11 -2011, which has been upheld right up to the Apex Court while dismissing SLP/Review petition/curative Petition in this case.
5. We, therefore, earnestly request you to please implement judicial verdict in its true spirit and content by issuing necessary instructions to the concerned authorities to disburse the arrears of pension tor the period 1-1-2006 to 23-9 2012 and stop further harassment and hardship to the aged pensioners in 70s and 80s (and a number of them being above 80-85 years at age) in their sunset years. For this, all that is required is to issue a corrigendum to your OM No 38140/12-P&PW(A) dated 28-1-2013 making it effective w.e.f. 1-1-2006.
Thanking you in anticipation.

With regards
Thanking you,
Yours faithfully.
sd/-
S.C. Maheshwari
Secretary Gent Bharat Pensioners Samaj

Wednesday, 2 July 2014

                         We Demand Minimum Wage

CIRCLE UNION TAKE UP THE ISSUE ,FOR PAYMENT OF SALARY DURING INDUCTION TRAINING

                 N F P E                                     Mobile-9853332489

ALL INDIA POSTAL EMPLOYEES UNION GROUP-C
ODISHA CIRCLE BRANCH BHUBANESWAR -751007

K.C.Patnaik                                                                                     R.C.Mishra
President                                                                                      Circle Secretary
                                                                                    Vice-President CHQ & Leader RJCM

E-mail ID-p3orissa@rediffmail.com

No. UN/AIPEU, Gr-C/Odisha/06-2014 Dated-01-06-2014.
REMINDER
To,
Sri Tilak De, IPoS.
Chief Post Master General,
Odisha Circle, Bhubasneswar-751001.

Sub- Disparity in payment to the PA induction trainees of Odisha Circle- training allowance is being paid to our trainees whereas payment of pay allowances to the trainees of West Bengal circle.
Respected Sir,
It has come to the notice of the union that the CPMG West Bengal Circle has issued order for payment of pay allowances to their PAs under induction training at PTC, Darabhanga recently and accordingly pay & allowances were being paid during their training period at Darabhanga. In this connection the order of CPMG, West Bengal circle bearing letter No Rectt/R-8/Direct-quota/2011-12 dated 13-06-2014 is annexed for favour of kind reference. After payment of such pay & allowances to West Bengal trainees, the payment of training allowances to the trainees of other circles were stopped. It has been told that Bihar Circle also paid the pay & allowances to their trainees.
The order of WB Circle at Para-3 clearly states about payment of pay allowances from the date of joining in in-house training and no question of stipend & allowance arise. Accordingly also the pay allowances to all induction trainees of WB Circle was paid including the induction training period.
On the circumstances stated above, as the selected candidates in the merit in our circle have been given with in-house training and appointment against the posts, it is requested to kindly cause payment of pay & allowances to all the induction trainees of Odisha circle to avoid disparity.
Encl. As above
SOLICITING KIND RESPONSE
WITH REGARDS.
Yours faithfully

(R.C.Mishra)
Circle Secretary
Copy to- All Circle office bearers/ All divisional secretaries.

Circle Secretary



Biennial Conference of All India Postal Employees Union, Group-C, Sambalpur Divisional Branch, Odisha Circle


The 38th Biennial Conference of All India Postal Employees Union, Group-C, Sambalpur Divisional Branch was held at Sambalpur from 28.06.2014 to 29.06.2014.

The following members were elected unanimously.

 1
President
Com. P.C.Rout
SPM, Ainthapali SO
2
Vice President
Com. Taranisen Bhusagar
SPM, Budharaja SO
3
Vice President
Com. Pabitra Kumar Patel
SPM, K.M.Road SO
4
Vice President
Com. A.K.Patra
PA, Bargarh HO
5
Secretary
Com. Pradeep Kumar Satpathy
PA, Burla MDG
6
Asst. Secretary
Com. Sukanta Ch. Pattnaik
SPM, CA Chiplima SO
7
Asst. Secretary
Com.Miss. Sangita Bhoi
OA, Division Office
8
Asst. Secretary
Com. Sushil Kumar Senapati
PA, Jharsuguda HO
9
Asst. Secretary
Com. Ramesh Ch. Sahu
PA, Bargarh HO
10
Fin. Secretary (Treasurer)
Com. Surendra Kumar Biswal
PA, Modipara SO
11
Fin. Asst. Secretary (Asst-Tr)
Com. Anjan Kumar Hota
PA, Bargarh HO
12
Fin. Asst. Secretary(Asst-Tr)
Com. D.P. Naik
PA, Jharsuguda HO
13
Org. Secretary
Com. Rupesh Bag
PA, Jharsuguda HO
14
Org. Secretary
Com.Ramnarayan Pradhan
PA, Bargarh HO
15
Org. Secretary
Com.Dagar Pera
SPM, Bamra SO
16
Auditor
Com. Ganeshram Kuanr
Acct. Jharsuguda HO

 AIPEU, Group-C, PURI Divisional branch congratulates all the newly elected office bearers.

Tuesday, 1 July 2014

Budget 2014: Finance Ministry may double tax exemption limit under 80C to Rs 2 lakh

Seeking to boost household savings, the Finance Ministry is considering doubling the exemption limit for investments by individuals in financial instruments to Rs 2 lakh.

Presently the investments and expenditures up to a combined limit of Rs 1 lakh get exemptions under Sections 80C, 80CC and 80 CCC of the Income Tax Act.

Sources said the revenue department is assessing the burden on the exchequer in case of increase in the benefit limit. The announcement is expected in the Budget.

The Budget for 2014-15 will be presented by Finance Minister Arun Jaitley in the Lok Sabha on July 10.

There have been demands from bankers and insurers to hike the tax exemption limit from Rs 1 lakh per annum to encourage household savings.

The savings rate has come down from over 38 per cent of GDP in 2008 to 30 per cent in 2012-13.

The hike in the exemption limit, sources said, would provide much needed relief to the salary earners who are reeling under the impact of high inflation.

The Direct Taxes Code (DTC) too has recommended that the combined ceiling for investments and expenditures be raised to Rs 1.5 lakh per annum.

The financial instruments which enjoy exemption include life insurance premium, public provident fund, employees provident fund, National Savings Certificates, repayment of capital on home loan, equity linked saving schemes sold by mutual funds and bank FDs of five year maturity.

Source:-The Economic Times